Setting the path to an open and agile enterprise

Bjoern Negelmann (Conference Chair for Kongress Media) offered me this interview I publish below while he is preparing the next Enterprise2.0 Summit planned in Frankfurt (Germany) October 26.-28.,2010. I was invited by Kongress Media to be one of their Ambassadors and I accepted right away as entrepreneur, "noosphere" enthusiast and wiki evangelist. I will add short comments to Bjoern's responses (I'm afraid I would have be a very bad ambassador ;-) )

Q1 The Enterprise 2.0 Summit 2010 is focused on "Setting the path to an open and agile enterprise". Lot of buzz about enterprise and openness, but after more than one century of secret process, patent, industrial spying, in 2010 what the enterprises could gained by openness? 

Briefly - openness supports a more holistic understanding of the enterprise to internal and external stakeholders. With everybody microblogging about their work efforts internally, documenting and sharing the results of their project efforts in wikis and interconnecting with different peers in the internal and external realm - the value generation of the enterprise becomes more transparent for those who are allowed to view it. If there are any potentials of improvement anybody can get involved and give his or her input and suggestions. This allows not planned and executed solution finding and generation beyond political and organizational boundaries. So again - openness leads to speeding up time-to-market and improve the flexibility and agility the enterprise acts on the market! 

''
My point of view: JP Rangaswami wrote:"For information to have power, it needs to be held asymmetrically. Preferably very very asymmetrically. Someone who knows something that others do not know can do something potentially useful and profitable with that information." This time is over: information can no more be held asymmetrically because of the Internet. Value will no more be generated by "scarcity" but only by "conversation". 

Q2 What is the concept of the Enterprise 2.0 SUMMIT in Frankfurt? As I could see from the webpage there are 3 days of program with a lot of international guests and a bunch of corporate people speaking about their project. 

Yes - indeed I think the most differentiating point of the E2.0 SUMMIT in Frankfurt is the number of corporate representatives on the speaker's list. The E20 SUMMIT is not the conference about the E20 visions - not at all. It's about the practical insights of the first movers and the solutions towards the challenges of E20 projects. These two aspects are forming the two tracks of our two day conference. Then again each track is divided into different sessions with short talks and a lot of discussions. Additionally there are three keynote sessions on strategic questions as e.g. "what are the characteristics of the manager 2.0?" and an open space workshop where the participants are getting involved to talk and discuss their detailed questions. Optional the E20 SUMMIT provides two pre-conference workshops about "social messaging" and the "social networking culture". 

Q3 What will be your most favourite session of the upcoming event? 

This is hard to decide but spontaneously I would say that's the session on the question of how to overcome the cultural boundaries in E20 projects. This is a session we already did last year but it is so relevant that we have to talk about this year again. Behind this session there is the discussion about E20 projects in international companies. As the E20 projects in larger corporation within any European country is always also an project within an international setting - this is very relevant and also distinguishing from discussion in the pure Anglo-Saxon context - with everybody have the same mother tongue and nearly the same cultural values. 

''
My point of view: International Enterprises headed in European Countries are very lucky to experience the european "melting pot" every day. They are trained to pay attention to conversations over the borders...

Q4 During the preparation of the E20 Summit did you notice any new tendencies compared to your work for the previous E20 Summit? 

Well - yes - the E20 idea is more widely spread. There are good practices from first movers - mainly with E20 initiatives focussing on some specific use scenaries as "improving the general information flow by micro-blogging" or "making the corporate knowledge more transparent by documenting projects into wikis". With this the discussions about the challenges of E20 projects become more specific - we are not anymore discussing about the challenges of "adoption" but about the challenges of "rewarding systems", "community management" and new "leadership models". 

Q5 About speakers, what is from your point of view, the main differences between European and US speakers?(what about Asia speakers)? 

That's a great question. Honestly said we haven't had any Asian speaker and always only a few US speakers as we are mainly focussing the practical insights of the intra-European context. But comparing the Europeans and the Americans it would say the main difference is in the "point of view" of the subject. Though it might not be representative as we always invited only US speakers for overview talks but in discussions with them and other US experts in the E20 field I would say they stick very much towards the high-level E20 discussion. They tend to argue very much on the big cultural changes and less on the specific, hands-on details. Especially the German corporates they want to know the specific details of how to set up the community management or the leadership model first - before turning the "big" wheel of the changement of the corporate cultural. At the end for a successful project you need both - but the approaches are different. 

''
My point of view: for me the most interesting part of the e20Summit. I used to imagine US managers as "solution-makers", always with a check-list in hand. But you are right I forget their "pioneer spirit", their preference to change the world (in a pragmatic way, far from the french way...)

Comments [2]

Under the Milky Way

Done in three days in Joshua National Park (USA)...Pluie de Météorites des Perséïdes.

The Perseids is the name of a prolific meteor shower associated with the comet Swift-Tuttle. The Perseids are so-called because the point they appear to come from, called the radiant, lies in the constellation Perseus.

Comments [0]

Traffic in Lisbon – emphasis on sluggish areas

Really looks like the nervous system in the human body (a bit "chaotic" too)

"One month (October 2009) of traffic information (1534 vehicles) is condensed in a 24h day. The arteries are colored in a away capable to represent average traffic speeds (the greenish and cooler represents high traffic velocity, and the reddish and hotter, corresponds to sluggish traffic). There is a visual emphasis on areas where the traffic is predominantly slow."

Comments [0]

Is really Greece the bone of contention in Europe?

European Union governments are suspended to Greek Prime Minister's economic plan to save its country from bankruptcy. But what about the public finance states of the rest of the European Union?

First fact:
Government borrowing reflects a fundamental disequilibirum between spending and tax revenue. Borrowing as a % of GDP has been increasing in past few years, despite economic growth.

Second fact:
Present Government borrowing is not to finance investment in the economy. A large percentage of the debt is to finance transfer payments to an ageing population. Paying pensions and health care to an ageing population, will do nothing to facilitate economic growth and higher tax revenues. It will get more and more difficult to finance the national debt.

Third Fact:
As National Debt increases as a % of GDP, it means that the interest payments as a % of GDP increase. Therefore, higher levels of taxes have to be spent on just financing the national debt.

Best bets for a solution:

1. Inflation
A government may be tempted (or forced) to fill the shortfall in revenue by printing money. Printing money and increasing the money supply, will lead to inflation.
Impossible scenario inside the EU: all the governments are depending of the European Central Bank which unique politic is the deflationary one.

2. Unemployment 
Social rules and supports in Europe are absorbing the long lasting unemployment in the european countries. It is increasing the public government debt, letting less fresh money for private productive investments. The shift to a new economy is delayed by politic measures of the 20th century.

3. Devaluation of the money.
Other impossible scenario! The weakest countries of the Euro-zone had to bear the weight of a high-valued money with no hope of a support coming from the richest (see case of Grecia).

The bone of contention is therefore the unique money, the Euro. Thanks to the British eurosceptics, UK is out the Euro-zone. Can you imagine the situation of the European Union with UK as one of the big player in the Euro-zone?

Related articles by Zemanta

Zemanta helped me add links & pictures to this email. It can do it for you too.

Comments [0]

Enterprise 2.0 is trendy or...?

David Terrar and Dennis Howlett on Enterprise 2.0.
Yes it is obvious that social media and enterprise have not met each other. Few early adopters (Coca-cola, Dell, StarBuck,...) have experimented social tools in the marketing area, others as a kind of social intranet (IBM,NASA,...) but the all in one Enterprise 2.0 (= a social platform with bottomup stream of information, integrating providers and customers voices to deliver the best "social service" to one customers' community) is not born.
Is it an utopy? is it a good medicine against crisis mood ? In my point of view the 20ie century pattern for enterprise had to change. Why?
- because of Information Technology. The enterprise cannot resist to the pression of customers' information nor to providers' information. This is a fact.
- what about the employees: they are best informed than their leaders! This is also a fact.
If Dennis Howlett is very sceptical with "enterprise 2.0" buzz, what about Enterprise Y ?

Comments [0]

Culture Jamming and Social Media culture

Tagging or cutting, splicing and reworking ads in the public area are illegual and controversial.
On January 30, 2009, while attending a benefit for Friends We Love artist's video documentaries, a person thought to be Poster Boy was arrested by undercover police agents waiting for him. This "Poster Boy" was charged with two misdemeanor counts of criminal mischief and went before a Judge on Monday, February 9, 2009.
The Poster Boy movement could be associated to Culture Jamming:
Culture jamming is intended to be a means of allowing the people to take advantage of their right to ‘free speech’ and to call into question what the media tells them to think or believe.

Social Platforms are claimed to be customers' loudspeakers and in a legal way they are a stage for people to create, talk, discuss, relaying Poster "boys" underground game.

What do you think about Poster Boy Movement?

Comments [0]

What about Europe Economic Union in 2010?

Apart of the flagrant desiquilibrium existing in the Europe Union, between the top contributing countries and the remaining countries, apart of the constantely growing european bureaucraty contrasting with stagnant democraty, I think urgent to try to understand why Euro currency is so high against the USD despite low interest rate and deep recession.

One expert assets investor told me in 2006 he did'nt understand exchange markets, all the indicators were pointed to a situation which never happened. Now, after reading Financial systems and terrorism expert Loretta Napoleoni, I wonder myself if we maybe underestimate the the phenomenon of economic interdependence after September 11th, 2001.

As Loretta Napoleoni told us:
1- "...the Patriot Act, which was a piece of legislation aimed at blocking the funding to terrorist organisations, eventually created a terrible and detrimental situation in other Countries, in this case Europe as a whole, turning Europe into the money laundering capital of the world, all of this between September 11 and now..."
2- "...Many of the problems that you have heard about regarding the banks are precisely linked to deregulation, to the lack of legislation and to the fact that the banks were granted high levels of freedom with very little control by the State.
What happens with deregulation? In essence, it amounts to the removal of financial barriers and the removal of financial legislation and the controls between two countries. But who has benefited from this?...From the mid-sixties through to 2001, a certain amount of new money, namely the bills printed annually by the Federal Reserve, was illegally taken out of circulation in America in suitcases or cardboard boxes that left the country in the form of boxes required for removals, etc, illegally in other words, and this money went towards satisfying the demand for cash, not only from criminal elements, but also from terrorist organisations and various other sectors of the underground economy..."
3- "...the Patriot Act was only introduced in the United States and is only applicable to the Dollar, so it has totally revolutionised the cash flows of the legal economy and the underground economy alike...no one wanted any Patriot Act introduced in another country that would enable outsiders to scrutinise any dealings between a bank and its customers...the international banks advised their customers to abandon the Dollar Zone and switch to the Euro. The Euro was the new European currency that had just recently come into circulation, so it offered numerous opportunities and, above all, Europe did not have any legislation similar to the Patriot Act and indeed there were tax havens in existence in Europe that worked very well, with no one checking up on anything..."
5- "... this money laundering is occurring via the real estate sector and it is thus very difficult to control because, for example, the Deeds Registry Office on the Costa del Sol has no way of communicating with the Deeds Registry Office in London, so they will never know whether the same company is busy making purchases in various locations in Europe, either simultaneously or at different times and, furthermore, there is no system in place to monitor the financial and cash transactions in Euro that may be taking place across European borders, there is no such thing!"

Europe has become the money laundering capital of the world. This is one more aspect we have to take in account as we think about Europe Union as the only mean to maintain peace and economic development in the old Western Continent.

Do you think Europe Union free market is good for Europeans?

ref: http://www.beppegrillo.it/en/2009/04/european_parliament_loretta_na_1.html

Comments [0]

What are the differences between European and US entrepreneurs?

French language

Image via Wikipedia

As usual after LeWeb conference in Paris, we have plenty to learn and read from US people feedback about the European event.

This year 2009 was particularly interesting as one part of the conference focused on Startups and some of the american bloggers (Scoble heading the team) on the French ones.

According to my readings, mixing the ideas, I will give you my feelings about the differences between EU and US entrepreneurs (startup), expecting to read yours.
1- US entrepreneurs are very well prepared to make public presentation and EU less.
2- EU entrepreneurs are dealing with more state rules (and EU rules) and do need to adapt themselves.
3- US entrepreneurs are in the cloud (Twitter,Facebook,Skype) and EU less.
4- EU entrepreneurs usualy are trying to settle first in their country using their social connections on the ground and US do the same.
5- US entrepreneurs are in an homogeneous environment and do not imagine how is the world outside their borders and EU imagine it quite perfectly.

Despite world globalisation, new technologies, social tools and reds, culture or mankind do not change so quickly. We have great entrepreneurs on both sides, no matter how they make the job (by the way, what is the origin of "entrepreneur"?).
Deezer CEO is french, not well kown in US, but he dealt successfully with the Majors, permitting listening whole song or sonate for free. Maybe this is the main reason of his discretion.

At the end of the day the weaknesses pointed out here are nothing regardless to our natality curve on both sides of the Atlantic.

Are you ready to change for the other continent OR do you feel well in yours?
 


Related articles by Zemanta

Zemanta helped me add links & pictures to this email. It can do it for you too.

Comments [0]

Enterprise 2.0: the Best of

Two conferences about Enterprise 2.0 in one month, one in San Francisco (US), one in Frankfurt (Germany, Europe), is the business world looking for a magical remedy to the recession?

Obviously the 2.0 "revolution" is boiling for longer time ago than the financial crisis. In the companies the recession had give a push to what could be the end of mass-consumption, mass-production...maybe end of capitalism, version. 19th century.

This video is setting the stage to give you the Best of the two conferences and invite you to comment on:
* http://diwiki.com/index.php/Best_of_Enterprise2.0_Summit

What large companies understand about Enterprise 2.0
What about the workforce

Measuring collaboration benefits: Wiki-experiment in the German Armed Forces


Filed under  //

Comments [0]

Frugal happyness in a kitchen

Lulu and the Lampshades doesn't need an orchestra, sophisticated lights and sound mixing...just a good sence of rhythm and beautiful voice, et voila everybody feels better.

Filed under  //

Comments [1]